Kenya is a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty on Anti-Personnel Landmines.
However the process of the ratification of the treaty has to go through
the requisite administrative, legislative and legal formalities in the
country before the implementation of further action.
We are indeed fortunate that Kenya unlike other countries in the
region, has no known minefields. This is mainly clue to its past and
present stability. We are however concerned by the presence of heavily
mined areas within the territories of some of our regional neighbors. We
are confident that as a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty, Kenya will
continue to work together bilaterally and multilaterally with our
neighbors and other members of the international community towards making
the region a safer area.
In the previous consultative forums held in the country between NGOs
and other interest groups, the problem of unexploded ordinance has
featured prominently. I want to reassure this forum that the
government is duty bound to ensure the safety of its citizens by reacting
promptly in the destruction of the unexploded ordnance. In this regard,
the government is working in collaboration with the local communities
whenever such dangerous items are spotted.
The problem of unexploded ordnance dates bark to activities of various
military groups in the region during world war 11 and cannot be attributed
to any particular army. In the post World War Two period, military
training has continued in specific designated training areas. In the
recent past, the growth in Kenya's population has exerted pressure on land
and other natural resources resulting in the movement of pastoralists and
farmers into designated military training areas. Many of these groups are
not aware of the dangers of traversing such terrain, which may still
harbour unexploded ordnance. Periodically, reports are received to the
effect that herd boys have either been killed or maimed by unexploded
ordnance. These however, are very isolated incidents. All military troop
training institutions in Kenya are under obligation to ensure that no
unexploded ordnance is left behind after each training activity.
As far as the regional efforts on de-mining programs are concerned,
we feel that there is need for the programs to be supported by programmed
training assistance to individual troops in the affected countries and
this should include provision of equipment. Peacekeeping activities now
taking place in the Horn of Africa region will be heavily dependent upon
the availability of de-mining equipment and trained personnel in order to
achieve their objectives. This will require goodwill and cooperation among
all parties involved in the past and current conflicts.
We therefore urge those partners that have shown willingness to assist
in the provision of training and equipment for demining teams to
continue doing so in order to make this goal attainable. This is due
to the enormous cost of both equipment and training.
Finally, we want to emphasize that it is evident from the recent trends
that foreign troops from outside the continent of Africa are gradually
declining in their participation in the resolution of African conflicts.
They state that the onus is on the African troops themselves to
participate in the restoration of peace. Such participation includes
de-mining activities in certain regions. The Africans laid the mines and
have an obligation to do the demining.
It is our sincere hope, that with the help and participation of the
International community, Africa will be able to eradicate the menace of
landmines.